Earlier we had this exchange:
example, I could very easily list all of your quotes that give me the
impression that you are arrogant.
apologists tend to label me "arrogant", but I've never succeeding in coaxing
one to substantiate that charge in any way, let alone explain how I could
rephrase the substance of what I write in a way that they wouldn't
(arbitrarily) call "arrogant". If I'm confident that my worldview can be and
has been successfully defended, then I'm only "arrogant" if that confidence is
unjustified, or is used to intimidate or insult someone. I shouldn't be
considered "arrogant" simply because my confidence in my worldview is greater
-- or more justified -- than is someone else's confidence in her own
site you have now written:
DIRECT HIT DEBATE TIP:
is believing that your opinion is right.
Arrogance is believing that your
Today's Direct Hit was inspired by Brian
Frustration is spouting unsubstantiated calumny because
you can't defend your opinions.
"could very easily" list quotes of mine that indicate arrogance, I (for the
third time) invite you to do so. Until then, you remain in the heap of
frustrated Christian apologists who have made this hit-and-run accusation
without having the integrity to try to back it up.