Subject: Re: A more proper analogy Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 13:56:51 -0700 From: Brian Holtz Organization: Sun Microsystems Newsgroups: alt.atheism.moderated Netcom jimhumph wrote: > Incidentally' faith ' does not mean unevidenced belief: Surely for our purposes it does not simply mean belief without certitude, or belief that is especially strong. Would you agree to define 'faith' as belief based on revelation and exempt from doubt? Do you have any such beliefs (i.e. that are based on revelation and exempt from doubt)? -- Brian Holtz H:650-OK-HOLTZ http://holtz.org brian@holtz.org W:650-SUN-0598 http://holtz.org/Brian.vcf C:650-TOP-HOLT callto:brian@holtz.org