From: Brian Holtz [brian@holtz.org] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:09 AM To: alt.atheism.moderated Subject: Re: Logical Disproof of the Existence of an Omniscient Being "Paul Holbach" wrote: > (S) Nobody knows that this statement is true. As I posted here on Jan 8 in response to remarks about chaos and indeterminacy: A better (but not dispositive) argument against divine omniscience is to contrast it with free will. A dispositive (but somewhat trivial) argument against unqualified omniscience is the sentence "God does not know this sentence is true". The standard theistic response to the latter sort of observation is to limit omniscience to knowing only (and all) things that can be known (just as omnipotence is being able to do everything that can be done). -- brian@holtz.org http://humanknowledge.net